Done. Too bad the basilisk question wasn't on it; I hope that will one day be possible.

Did the survey!

I took the survey. Out of curiosity (too late to change now) what should I have answered if I'm not my father's first child, but I'm the first child he had with my mom? (There are kids from my dad's first marriage, but I didn't grow up with them).

I went with "no older siblings" since I assumed this was a question about socialization (or maybe even about uterine environment) but not siring. But I'd like to know for next year.

Taken! The way you were being so apologetic about the length, I thought it would be much more grueling - I found it quick and fun! :)

I completed the survey, huzzah!

Filled in, but did not do digit lengths because I have no access to a printer or scanner in the near future.

Did the survey. Also, now I know my digit ratio!

Done.

I'm a bit confused about the accuracy of my BSRI because my true answer was frequently 'only towards my SO', such that my score would be drastically different were I single.

Survey complete! I'd have answered the digit ratio question, but I don't have a ruler of all things at home. Ooh, now to go check my answers for the calibration questions.

I'm done, but my ruler isn't good enough that I'm super confident in my digit ratios; I would have preferred one less significant digit (no pun intended, but I'll take it anyway).

Taken! Thanks as always for running it

Took the survey.

And yeah you should warn about the material needed for the digit ratio question in advance, so people don't start the survey if they aren't in the right conditions for it.

Took the survey. I always feel like I did the last one only recently.

Done - and mildly disappointed that we won't be measuring the prevalence of transponyism this year.

Does this post appear on LW's Main or Discussion pages for anyone else? I only found it via an offsite reference. Edit: Nevermind, I had my Main set to 'Promoted' instead of 'New'.

Took the survey.

I did the survey. (Comments on specific aspects appear as replies.)

I finished the survey.

Taken the survey (would have loved to do digit ratio, but too difficult to get access to the equipment needed).

I took the survey. Started on the BSRI but abandoned it because I found the process of giving vague answers to vague questions distressing.

Except for the digit lengths, survey taken!

About two hours ago, I submitted an incomplete census return -- it looks as if some keystroke produces an immediate submission, at least on my browser. I'll be submitting a complete one later today. Yvain, if you want to suppress the incomplete one and need help in identifying it then I can help. I was partway through the calibration questions when I accidentally submitted.

(I see TrE had the same problem.)

[EDITED to add: Complete return now submitted.]

Done.

Didn't have a scanner, so I traced my hand on a piece of paper with a pencil and measured that. Not sure I got enough accuracy to take seriously. Oh, well.

Took the survey. My first one. Thanks for putting it together Yvain/Dan.

I'm missing something here, I filled in the public and private and keys, but saw no game theory problem. Are we being given equal chances of the monetary reward?

Anyway, fun survey.

I took it. If it's anything like last year, officially 2/5 of my karma will be from surveys.

Did it! I'm shocked that my digit ratio is so high. Like, I figured that it was pretty high, being a bisexual genderfluid "man" (assigned at birth, that is), but I didn't expect it to be greater than 1. Also, it was much shorter than I expected.

Taken. Wasn't bothered by the length -- could be even longer next time.

I exist in a quantifiable way! (I took the survey)

Answered all I could except the digit one because of no access to scanner. Looking forward to the results!

Completed. Very excited to see the digit ratio data.

I completed the survey (and learned surprising things about my digit ratio)

I took the survey! This is my third survey.

Done.

I think it is somewhat unrealistic to expect individual digit ratios to be accurate to three significant figures (although I understand that two significant figures might be too crude a measure to show effects of smaller size). One can hope that the errors are symmetric and it doesn't matter.

Answered. WRT Type of Global Catastrophic Risk, I answered conditioned on greater than 90% of humanity being wiped out before 2100, which I assume is what you meant. If it wasn't, well, I ruined everything, then.

Done

Survey done, awesome as usual, Yvain. Can't wait for the results.

I did the survey in all its parts, and upvoted every top level comment to promote LW's census partecipation.

It was fun and not particularly long, although I miss the 'global prisoner dilemma' of the last survey.

Completed!

Did the survey.

Did the survey!

Done. Fairly high confidence that I'm still the lone Filipino LessWronger.

I did the survey.

I took it. A bit sad that it's shorter than the last one.

In-group fuzzes acquired, for science!

Just completed my first survey!

I took the survey.

Finished the survey. Didn't answer the SSC question even though I read it regularly because I plan to take the edited version when it's posted there, and I also didn't answer the digit ratio question.

Survey surveilled!

Did it, that was fun! Can't wait for the results.

Did the survey! I think i gave highly contradictory answers.