Aw, Robin should have kept his old chart where the future of the world's economic activity was in Ii. That would be a lot easier for people to pronounce than Rovaniemi.

(the old chart I'm referring to is from Upload Economics 101 which is basically the same talk in somewhat more depth and with more of the Awkward Robin Chuckle)

Jaan Tallinn devotes his talk to an argument for deism - via the simulation argument. Not many rationalists think that deism is very likely. So - as an exercise for any unbelievers out there - where do you think Tallinn makes his mistake?