Feedback from Less Wrong Community

Instead of Yes/No on the "will you buy it" question, you might add options like "maybe >50%" and "maybe <50%." There's a definite chance that I will buy the one that I'm voting for, but it's less than 50% so I'm just going to answer "no."

2 points

expand_less expand_more

scott_from_castify

1 point

expand_less expand_more

4 years ago

I suppose what we'd really like to know is the expected value of of each sequence so we can do the one with the highest expected revenue. We could have asked you to put probabilities of purchasing each sequence next to the name of the sequence. Maybe next time…

1 point

expand_less expand_more

somervta

0 points

expand_less expand_more

4 years ago

I'm so tempted to say quantum just to see how you do it!

But no. Responded, seriously.

0 points

expand_less expand_more

scott_from_castify

0 points

expand_less expand_more

4 years ago

What we'd probably do is, for most articles, just tell you it's best to read the article here. We've done that quite a few times before and try to let people know we do this when describing the product.

0 points

expand_less expand_more

falenas108

-1 points

expand_less expand_more

4 years ago

I don't think you can physically do the quantum sequence, because so much of it is diagrams.

-1 points

expand_less expand_more